LET'S ALL GET PISHED IN KELVINGROVE. INVITE YOUR PALS

Last Friday, as the rest of the country settled down to happy clappy street parties, boulevards decked out in union jacks and wall to wall television coverage of a fairytale wedding, a rather different story was unfolding in Glasgow.

The city hit the national headlines after a massive unauthorised party, which saw up to 10,000 mostly young people converge on Kelvingrove Park, descended into a riot after police waded in to shut down the event in the late afternoon. The party had been announced just a few days before through facebook, with the event page rapidly garnering thousands of attendees.

What had been billed as just an excuse to have a party in nice weather, playing on David Cameron’s advice to ‘go ahead and have’ parties and for local councils to ‘not interfere’, rapidly developed a political nature when Glasgow City Council issuing a panicked statement warning revellers to stay away from the ‘unsafe and unofficial’ event, the day before it was due to go ahead. Within hours, the ensuing media coverage had ensured the number attending the facebook event, set up by two teenagers, shot up to 15,000.

It was perhaps inevitable that with thousands of people drinking (heavily) in close proximity for most of an afternoon, and every young team in Glasgow in attendance, that fights might break out. Fears about a sectarian riot proved overblown though, with little evidence of religious tension, nor much sign of union jacks or pro-monarchy regalia for that matter either.

Mass disorder, however, was definitely not inevitable, and serious questions need to be asked about how the police responded to isolated incidents in the park. What’s not been made clear in the subsequent narrative presented by the police is that senior officers on the scene made a decision to try and clear the park around 5pm. This is before the alleged ‘riot’ kicked off. But soon after, the soundsystem was pulled,  the cops horse charged revellers, and then brazenly attempted to make a series of  arrests.

Over the week following the street party, the authorities in Glasgow have entered the throes of a moral panic, coming to the sudden realisation that young people can organise parties on the internet and there’s very little they can do about it. Their response has been characterised by a mix of lies, scare-tactics and sheer panic – promising to pursue the two teenage organisers for the supposed £40,000 clean-up bill, which then became a £25,000 bill, threatening the license of the nightclub which provided the soundsystem for the party, and massively overreacting to a rash of copycat events which have sprung up on facebook. As I write this, Kelvingrove Park is under lock and key for the first time in its 150 year history, due to a completely imaginary “mass waterfight” that the council  have seized upon in order to justify this show of strength from the authorities today. Throughout the day, the park’s fountain has been surrounded by metal fencing, while police and council officials have been posted outside the park’s numerous entrances. Even more hilariously, a joke event created earlier in the week – ‘Osama bin Laden’s Kelvingrove Street Party’ (event description: HE’S DEED. LET’S ALL GET PISHED IN KELVINGROVE. INVITE YOUR PALS), which gained 15,000 guests in just a few hours, sparked mass hysteria in the Scottish media. It was a joke event, and unsurprisingly Kelvingrove has bore witness to neither a mass waterfight nor an Osama bin Laden party today, despite the best efforts of the council to manufacture this threat.

BAN THIS SICK FILTH

Glasgow City Council’s vision for the city essentially amounts to one giant glorified shopping mall. SSY has extensively covered their attempts to gentrify, commercialise and “regenerate” the city, which more often than not amounts to running roughshod over the local populace in order to satisfy the needs of commercial interests – whether that’s demolishing the Buchanan Street steps, killing off the Barras market, demolishing centres for the disabled in order to accommodate car parks or attempting to drive all forms of political dissent out of the city centre. This is all being stepped up ahead of the unwanted and expensive Commonwealth Games, to be held in 2014.

It’s clear that mass unauthorised and, vitally, free parties in public parks do not fit into the council’s vision for the future of the city. Partying can be kept strictly to clubs and bars in the city centre, where  ”unacceptable levels of drunkenness” form part of a solid revenue stream to the authorities. Excessive policing and council bureaucracy can, to paraphrase the Prime Minister, get tae fuck. It’s our city. And it’s our park.

5 Comments

  1. Mhairi McAlpine says:

    This article is spot on in many regards, not least of which is the final statement.

    That has two corollaries, firstly that we have the right to the park, and secondly we have a responsibility to it.

    There has to be serious questions asked about the role of both the council and the police in the shut down of the street party of 29th April. From the footage I’ve seen, although certainly there was a small fight happening which the police, quite justifyably, stepped into, it would appear however that this occurred after they had already taken the decision to shut down the event, and after stepping into quite a minor scuffle, they escalated the situation quite considerably from the initial breakup of the fight, through mounted police and aggressive crowd control. The police however were unlikely to be acting in isolation in shutting it down in the first place. Whether Glasgow City Council likes it or not, the event on the 29th was perfectly lawful, so it is unlikely that the police would have stepped in of their own accord. It is much more likely that a request came from the Council, who managed to keep a low profile, but questions must be asked of them too, which kind of takes me to the next point.

    The fact that this city and park is ours gives us a responsibility to it. The litter made on the 29th was phenomenal; others have told me that this is a common state of the park after large events. As these events are approved it is tolerated and cleared up by the fairies in the council cleansing department overnight – as indeed happened with the aftermath of this event. Whether formally organised or otherwise, thats a shocking state of affairs. Parks are a common good, and as a common good, they need to be cared for by the commons. While it is indeed shocking and unfair that the organisers have been fined £40K for clean up, it is also unfair for the attendees to expect their mess to be cleaned up for them and unfair for Glasgow City Council to have to do this. One of the reasons that there was such a mess was that park facilities are limited and there were no special arrangements put in place for that day. Although the event was not formally organised, GCC clearly knew it was happening as they requested people not to come. Limited additional facilities such as skips could have been provided at very short notice and would have substantially cut down on the mess…and the cost.

    I guess my point is that so long as people concede their responsibility to a public body to clear up the mess they make, their grip on their rights of free assembly in a public area is likely to be infringed. Challenging that infringement not only means directly addressing the actions of the police and the council, but also ensuring that responsibilities are adhered to. While the mess made at Kelvingrove clearly concerns some people as witnessed by the organising of a clean up party (just after the Council had already completed it), others are less so, with the mess being dismissed as no worse than any other public event.

  2. John Doe says:

    Pretty well written piece although can I make the point that on April 29th, it was not the police who chose to move in and shut down the music, it was the organisers. There was a realisation that it would have to stop around then in order to get the cumbersome gear needed for the party out of the park. And as far as the cavalry charge goes, it was pretty successful in stopping the sea of glass bottles from flying down the hill, which was simply ugly. The council have been damn shoddy though.

  3. Dom says:

    DOWN WITH THIS SORT OF THING!

  4. Anon says:

    I for one would have taken my rubbish with me were it not for the fact that if I had stopped to pick it up I would have been crushed by charging cavalry. With skips and less CS gas I think the litter problem would have been far less of a problem.

  5. Euan Benzie says:

    Strathclyde police are surely going to request that this article be taken down in case people actually turn up at Kelvingrove Park after reading this!