Fuck yer povvy weans!

The government have taken yet more measures to ConDem (geddit?!) the nation’s children to a life of poverty and misery.

Funding for Bookstart, which provides a free pack of books to every baby in the UK in order to “inspire, stimulate and create a love of reading that will give children a flying start in life”, is to be completely axed.

The organisation provides free books for children from the age of nine months until their first term of high school.

They began as a pilot project in 1992 but were awarded government funding in 2004 to become universal.  Despite having previously offered to take a 20% funding cut, Bookstart were recently  told they were to lose 100% of their £13m-a-year government grant, meaning the free books will end when the current contract does, in April.

Viv Bird, Chief Executive of Bookstart described being “astounded and appalled” on hearing the decision, saying:

“There was no dialogue. It was completely devastating.”

However, in the 10 days since the decision was announced, there have been messages of support and protest from a number of famous writers, including the Poet Laureate, Carol Ann Duffy, who said:

Support for Bookstart is support for the dreams and imaginations and futures of British children. To withdraw that support is to behave like Scrooge at his worst. Here’s hoping the powers-that-be see the light in tiime, as he did.

Duffy’s sentiments were echoed by previous Poet Laureate, Andrew Motion:

The decision to scrap Bookstart is an act of gross cultural vandalism. For the last 20-odd years the scheme has successfully introduced an enormous number of young people to both the pleasure and the necessity of reading and has been of tremendous benefit in the drive towards literacy. Very well organised, and very well run by Booktrust, it has become a national institution, and the envy of the world.The savings made by its abolition will be negligible; the damage done will be immense.

Renowned author Ian McEwan joined the chorus of support for Bookstart, saying:

I’m appalled to hear that Bookstart is for the chop and I’m counting on Michael Gove to reconsider. This modestly funded, truly civilised scheme has brought to millions of kids benefits far beyond the calculations of politicians. Who knows what seeds have been planted in young minds? It’s by initiatives like this that we hope to measure ourselves as a mature and thoughtful society. A U-turn on this would be an honourable choice.

But it’s Philip Pullman who spoke about Bookstart most beautifully:

It’s like seeing someone smashing aside a butterfly with the back of their hand: wanton destruction. Sheer stupid vandalism, like smashing champagne bottles as a drunken undergraduate. It doesn’t matter: someone else will clear it up. Well, if you miss the first years of a child’s development, nothing can clear it up. It’s gone. It won’t happen. A whole generation will lose out.

Bookstart is one of the most imaginative and generous schemes ever conceived. To put a gift of books into the hands of newborn children and their parents is to help open the door into the great treasury of reading, which is the inheritance of every one of us, and the only road to improvement and development and intellectual delight in every field of life.

Without access to literature, how can we be surprised when literacy levels are so low? In a world where many children start high school barely able to read and a child’s horror and confusion at receiving books for Christmas becomes an internet meme, we need a government that will encourage and nurture children, not abolish their chances in life to save a few pennies.

1 Comment

  1. CelticEwan says:

    I had heard vaugly about this Bookstart axing but hadn’t followed the story in detail, so I’m glad to have read this post. Philip Pullman makes a very important point that has been backed up by research: that a child’s early years are absolutely crucial for their development, and if they don’t gain certain basic skills (including curiosity about the world, and an interest in reading/learning) then their whole development as a human being for the rest of their life can be circumscribed. For a more instrumental point of view, they also lack the basic communication and other skills to allow them to get a job, so can be CONDEMned to future unemployment by their early years in school.

    Access to books and an interest in reading is so important not just for the skills, but for the way it can stimulate imagination and interest. The rich experience of reading cannot be measured in pounds ‘saved’ to pay for a crisis in capitalism. Such moves by the CONDEMs show a disregard for the right of all children to develop themselves and reach their potential as human beings.