Check out the short film above, by Mexico based filmaker and activist Greg Berger, aka Gringoyo, who’s been travelling around Latin America for over 10 years making insightful and funny films about the exploitation of the continent by capitalism and US imperial interests. He’s now asking viewers to contribute directly, so he can make 100% viewer funded films challenging the lies of the corporate media.
As the film explains, in 2006 Mexican President Felipe Calderon decided that, faced with massive power of the drugs cartels who control the flows of cocaine and other drugs into the US, he would use the military to take them down. The reason they are so powerful is that keeping drugs illegal in Mexico and the US means that those who traffick them stand to make immense profits from a completely unregulated market. They can then use this vast wealth to corrupt police forces, politicians and anyone that threatens their ongoing bonanza. Recently in Ciudad Juarez, the local paper appealed to drug lords as the “de facto rulers of the city” to explain what they should and should not published, after several of their journalists were murdered. Drug cartels love prohibition.
But Calderon’s solution wasn’t to start thinking about a rational, sane drugs policy, which recognises that humans have always
Felipe Calderon and Obama: united in wanting maximum profits for US arms manufacturers
and will always take drugs, and that this should be something that is legally regulated instead of left in the hands of gangsters. Oh no, he had a much better idea: send in the army, and go to war with cartels that are so heavily armed that fighting them amounts to a civil war. Since then, violence has spread throughout the country to many previously peaceful regions, and by the government’s own estiamtes 28,000 people have been killed, many of them after being horrifically tortured.
Last week US secretary of state made clear the position of the Obama administration on the whole mess, when she called for an equivalent of Plan Colombia for Mexico. In 1999, faced with a CIA assessment that the left wing FARC rebels were capable of taking power within 5 years, the US decided to pour money into the Colombian armed forces, making it the second biggest recipient of US military aid after Israel. The results were predictable, with intensified conflict and many more civilian deaths. But I suppose pouring petrol on the fire makes sense when you’re selling the petrol: US arms manufactures are growing fat on the profits of drug wars in Colombia and Mexico.
Sensationalist media coverage has helped bolster support for these policies in the US. To be fair, a lot of the cartels sound like they have been made up by the guy that wrote The Expendables on crack. For example, there’s La Familia, the Christian fundamentalist methamphetamine manufacturers, who in June ambushed a federal police convoy in Mexico killing 12. Their leader, Nazario Moreno — aka El Mas Loco, or The Craziest One — has written his own bible, and holds prayer meetings before going out on attacks. Their also funding political candidates to try and take over the government of their home state of Michoacan.
As you can see, Los Zetas are not short of guns
Then there’s the real action movie characters, Los Zetas. They started out as a an elite Mexican military special forces unit, trained by the School of the Americas and Israeli commandos. But then they realised there was more money to be made running the drugs trade than fighting it, defected and set themselves up as a well armed, highly trained paramilitary drugs cartel.
Hearing about some of the grisly antics of these mad bastards, you’re mind maybe does jump to the solutions you’ve been trained to think of by the entertainment industry – crush them with loads of guns. But what the story of Los Zetas shows is that will never work. There is literally no level of government that can’t be corrupted by the huge profits resulting from an unregulated drug market. And those same huge profits mean that no matter how much money the Mexican and US governments spend on fighting them, they’ll always be able to employ, train and equip soldiers.
Ironically, when Clinton advocated Plan Colombia for Mexico, it was in response to a question asking about what the US government was going to do about “the flow of drugs coming north and guns going south” (cartels arm themselves mainly in the US due to its insanely lax gun laws). It’s time countries like the US and UK woke up and realised that our prohibitionist policies don’t only cause huge harm to communities here: they also fuel brutal wars in countries like Mexico, Colombia and Afghanistan, and the only people happy about it are drug lords and western arms manufacturers.
Bonus: The single best news source on the Latin American drug wars is Narco News. Check it out all the time!
The best small piece of trivia I read as to why the US government is unlikely to ever beat the cartel’s came from Pablo Escobar’s mob – they needed to spend £2.5k a month on rubber bands to hold the money together. Cocaine is arguably the most profitable resource on earth.
Yes it is, because of prohibition. As long as the US ruling class insists on keeping drugs illegal, while impoverishing its own working class and hindering the economic growth of its Central and South American neighbours, there will always be a brutal and tragic ruining of many people’s lives.
If it was legal it would still be incredibly profitable and like all legal things that are incredibly profitable the scumbags than would run the industry would be insanely powerful and would effectively run the country were they grew the plant. The only difference would be instead of the poor people gaining a tonne of money and slightly more ethically peope it would be middle class tycoons. The chocolate industry is bad enough what would a cocaine industry fully regulated do to South America.
LOL!
I don’t like multinational corporations that control things like chocolate etc., but are you really trying to tell us the likes of Pablo Escobar, the AUC of Colombia etc. are “slightly more ethical”?!?!
Poor people do not gain a tonne of money from prohibition, the producers of cocaine etc. make fuck all, the profits go to the mad gangsters who we are keeping in business.
There’s no ideal solution to these problems while we still have international trade on a capitalist basis, but keeping drugs illegal by its nature will put the profits in the hands of people who are completely outside of any regulation and will automatically use violence and corruption to defend their interests. It’s insane.
Pablos Escobar for all his faults gave tonnes of money to the local peope and to people of columbia a lot of his mney found its way to charities. How many multinationals do this. I didn’t hear of the cocaine that say every two pounds of this coce will go to a starving family thanks for buying.
Socialism will not end the consumption of drugs nor will it end many social evils what it will do is hopefully to respect people much more than a capilist system and work for the people rather than the private companies.
I liked to draw your attention to the many coups all over the world that are the response to the petitioning of private business to countries like Britain and America. I would not say that Private business do not automatically use violence and corruption to defend their interests. At least in the west all you get is bumped out of your job but many times the interference of private business into your country in a devolping country means there is likely to be a civil war.
I don’t think socialism would end the consumption of drugs either, I also don’t think there’s anything inherently wrong with people using some drugs for their pleasure, like millions of people do with alcohol or cannabis. Obviously under socialism hopefully would be able to try and bring an end to the current social problems of addiction.
I know all about the role of multinationals around the world. But are you REALLY trying to claim that the companies and individuals who control the illegal drug trade are better. I’ll leave your rosy picture of Pablo Escobar for Andy to deal with cos he knows all about him, but you didn’t answer about the AUC. They’re a mass fascist militias in Colombia, funded by the huge profits to be made because of prohibition of cocaine. They have killed tens of thousands, wiped out whole villages, tortured people, chopped up children with chainsaws, fed people to alligators. . .the list of their absolute savagery goes on, and our drugs policies are what keep them in action.
Or what about the Afghan warlords that have enforced an absolute reign of terror and continue to do so, with systematic rape, torture and arbitrary murder, who pay for their weapons with the profit of heroin sold to Europe and Russia?
Drugs are a commodity that are sold in a completely unregulated marketplace. If we accept that there will always be a market for them, then we have to ask ourselves what we’re going to do to try and make things better. It’s impossible to regulate the market under prohibition, we must start moving towards a legal, regulated market in drugs.