He's a bastard, in't he?
By Calum Nelson, MPharm
In South Africa there’s a popular comedian called Matthias Rath. Here’s one of his jokes:
“Patient: Doctor Doctor, I’m worried about transmitting HIV to my unborn baby.
Doctor: Don’t worry, just have some potatoes. Whatever you do, don’t take any poisonous anti-viral medicine which will actually cause AIDS.”
It’s a screamer eh? Ok, I lied. Matthias Rath is actually a doctor from Germany, not a comedian, and some might also say he’s a serial killer. Not a serial killer in the Harold Shipman way, but his practices have almost certainly led to the deaths of thousands of South Africans.
South Africa is a nation with a massive HIV/AIDS crisis. It is currently estimated that 11% of South Africans are HIV-positive. This means that if you walk down a busy street in South Africa, chances are 1 in every 10 people you see has HIV. This changes by province; in KwaZulu-Natal the rate goes up to 26%. With a disease this widespread, anyone able to market a treatment might end up very rich very quickly and it appears that Matthias Rath also knew this.
Having studied medicine in his native Germany, Rath went into research in California. It was here that he started making claims about the use of high dose vitamins in treatment of cardiovascular disease. He began suggesting that conventional cancer treatments should not be used as they kill patients and that they should instead take Rath’s vitamin supplements. His books developed an impressive readership throughout Europe and he sold lots of interestingly priced vitamins. Despite being criticised and fined throughout Europe for claiming his pills could cure cancer, he developed an impressive following and an impressive bank balance, allowing him to try and break South Africa. Well he broke it alright.
With all guns blazing he filled newspaper pages with his claims. “Antivirals are a conspiracy by the pharmaceutical industry to poison you. Vitamins are the true solution to AIDS. Stop taking your antivirals right now…RIGHT NOW. STOP IT. STOP TAKING THEM. SPIT IT OUT. Now don’t let me catch you doing it again.” Ok, so those weren’t his exact words, but they might as well have been. Soon he was conducting trials, recruiting poor black township residents with promises of money or food. The patients were told to stop taking their antivirals and were instead given high doses of vitamins. Guess what happened. Guess. Everyone was actually fine and they all lived happily ever after. Sorry, typo, what I meant to say was that a considerable number of the study participants quickly deteriorated and died. The South African High Court eventually found that Rath’s trial was illegal. This could have ended up being an unfortunate isolated incident in which a doctor with crazy ideas performed an unethical trial. Thousands of lives may have been saved if one of Rath’s supporters didn’t just happen to be the President of the Republic of South Africa.
And so it came to pass that thanks to Matthias Rath, a country with one of the highest HIV rates in the world was telling people to take African potatoes and garlic instead of antivirals. The country refused to roll out antiviral treatment programmes; they turned down grant money intended for the purchase of HIV medication and even turned down donations of drugs. Presidential advisors recommended banning HIV tests and denied any knowledge of an AIDS epidemic in Africa. President Thabo Mbeki himself repeatedly denied that HIV is the sole cause of AIDS and his health minister Manto Tshabalala-Msimang repeatedly praised Rath’s work and publicly decried antiviral therapy as being dangerous and counterproductive. Overall it’s estimated that around 330,000 people died unnecessarily in the space of 5 years thanks to the government’s policy on antivirals.
Naturally these policies encountered opposition; the Western Cape province ignored governmental advice and continued to supply antiretrovirals. Groups such as Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) did their utmost to get HIV medication to those in need. This resulted in Anthony Brink, a colleague of Rath, taking TAC to the International Criminal Court in The Hague, accusing them of genocide. In his indictment Brink set out what he believed to be an appropriate punishment for Zachie Achmat, the founder of TAC:
“APPROPRIATE CRIMINAL SANCTION
In view of the scale and gravity of Achmat’s crime and his direct personal criminal culpability for ‘the deaths of thousands of people’, to quote his own words, it is respectfully submitted that the International Criminal Court ought to impose on him the highest sentence provided by Article 77.1(b) of the Rome Statute, namely to permanent confinement in a small white steel and concrete cage, bright fluorescent light on all the time to keep an eye on him, his warders putting him out only to work every day in the prison garden to cultivate nutrient-rich vegetables, including when it’s raining. In order for him to repay his debt to society, with the ARVs he claims to take administered daily under close medical watch at the full prescribed dose, morning noon and night, without interruption, to prevent him faking that he’s being treatment compliant, pushed if necessary down his forced-open gullet with a finger, or, if he bites, kicks and screams too much, dripped into his arm after he’s been restrained on a gurney with cable ties around his ankles, wrists and neck, until he gives up the ghost on them, so as to eradicate this foulest, most loathsome, unscrupulous and malevolent blight on the human race, who has plagued and poisoned the people of South Africa, mostly black, mostly poor, for nearly a decade now, since the day he and his TAC first hit the scene.
Signed at Cape Town, South Africa, on 1 January 2007
Anthony Brink”
Fortunately Rath’s heyday is over in South Africa. Manto Tshabalala-Msimang was replaced as health minister and Mbeki was replaced as president by Kgalema Motlanthe, who stated that “the era of AIDS denialism in South Africa is over.” Despite this, a massive amount of damage was done by Rath and the other AIDS dissidents in South Africa. The lack of HIV medication is estimated to have caused 35,000 babies to have been unnecessarily born with HIV and 171,000 preventable HIV infections. Antiviral medication is difficult enough for the poorest to afford at the best of times thanks to prohibitive pricing by the pharmaceutical industry and so extra restrictions are likely to have a devastating effect. Purely for the sake of money and advancing his own career, Rath destroyed thousands of lives and thousands of families across South Africa. In a similar fashion to our own MMR scare, irresponsible claims made with a lack of evidence proved dangerous and the importance of examining evidence is once again demonstrated.
and the award for cleverest headline in SSY blog history goes to…
It is an amazing headline, and a really interesting article. I knew about Thabo Mbeki and his AIDS denialism, but I didn’t no where this particular brand of conspiracy/denialist nonsense came from.
I recently read a really interesting article about denialist movements, whether its to do with vaccines, AIDS, climate change or evolution, trying to trace what they had in common. I think it’s well worth a read if you intend to seriously argue with these kinds of people.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20627606.100-living-in-denial-why-sensible-people-reject-the-truth.html?full=true
I expect such articles from tory websites and or GOP websites in the USA. I am a south African and I can confirm that you know absolutely nothing about nothing about the politics of Aids in my country. You seem to have relied on news clippings of openly pro-west and pro-big-pharma press of south Africa and the big-pharma sponsored “civil society group” , the TAC. The government of South Africa’s policies to HIV/AIDS were recorded in a comprehensive plan developed by Mbeki’s administration (after years of dithering by Nelson Mandela) in 2000, which was revised in 2006 and is in continued use. Interestingly we are informed that Zuma’s government means the death of denialism yet they are using the same policy developed by Mbeki! Go figure. To summarise the policy, it advocates prevention, and if a person is infected treatment (including nutritional supplements such as potatoes, garlic, beetroot and, yes vitamins, to boost the immune system), use of specific medications for specific infections, use of ARVs, etc. There’s absolutely nothing controversial about this, unless you suggest that starving people in the townships, with no excess to water or primary health care should be fed ARVs without nutritional supplements!
As a socialist I would expect that you would have a scientific affinity to facts, but you do not as exemplifies by the following:
@“The country refused to roll out antiviral treatment programmes”
An absolute falsehood! The government wanted to first distribute the drugs in test sites in order to establish the impact and resource requirements. The TAC wanted to roll out the drugs without such an assessment and won in a court case. Subsequently, it was proven that the government had been correct when Nevirapine mono-therapy was proven to be ineffectual and leading to drug resistance, and multi-drug therapy was introduced. The number of deaths resulting from the TAC’s irresponsible insistence will never be computed/estimated because it does not suit the agenda of Big Pharma (but we know that Mbeki killed 300 000 – 350 000 to 500 000 babies right?).
@ they turned down grant money intended for the purchase of HIV medication and even turned down donations of drugs.”
You have a strong aversion to analysis. You may have noticed that hat grant money (from the US PEPFER funding, has recently been cut down, leading to the collapse of treatment models that are reliant on it. You will note as well that the funding could only be used to purchase expensive US drugs and not, for example, Indian generics. You will also note that the donations of drugs related to Nevirapine for use for purposes in South Africa for which it was not approved by the FDA or the MCC (equivalent body in RSA). In any event this is a typical marketing strategy in any industry, give them for free and recover your costs in future rollout margins. Countries that were dumb enough to accept these “altruistic” donation (e.g. Botswana) are now burdened by an unsustainable treatment model.
@” Presidential advisors recommended banning HIV tests and denied any knowledge of an AIDS epidemic in Africa.”
This is another falsehood! HIV testing is a central pillar of the South African Aids strategy developed by Mbeki and currently being used! You confuse the issue with the controversy of whether or not HIV test are non-specific (they are non- specific) and whether or not there is a tendency towards false positives (there is) and whether or not it is therefore moral and cost efficient to allocate funding to a scourge that may prove not to be a scourge, particularly when the data of the Aids epidemic in Africa seems exaggerated (see recent UNAids revisal of Aids stats downwards).
@”President Thabo Mbeki himself repeatedly denied that HIV is the sole cause of AIDS”
Of course it is not. The orthodoxy, which I assume we both support, states that HIV results in the breakdown of the immune system, leading to increased infections, which eventually result in a syndrome (Aids), which leads death. Therefore if one is in an environment without infectious diseases and therefore never catches the syndrome (Aids), ones chances of survival may very well increase. Thus is it not therefore logical to deal with the other causes of AIDS (infectious diseases and weakened immune systems) whilst addressing HIV infections and improving treatment. Sounds logical to me, at least….PS: You state that he said HIV is not the sole cause of Aids which pre-supposes that it is one of the causes of Aids, ergo the fellow believed HIV causes Aids!
@”Overall it’s estimated that around 330,000 people died unnecessarily in the space of 5 years thanks to the government’s policy on antivirals.”
You neglect to mention that this is from one Study (from Harvard) that has not been countered by the orthodoxy, because it suites their thinking, and has been countered by the dissidents (although no mainstream medical journal will ever publish these contrary analysis). You also neglect to mention that the authors of the study are associated with the TAC (Mbeki’s sworn political opponents) and are associated with companies that profit from ARVs and are therefore in conflict.
In sum, strange bunch of socialists you are….