Well he’s finally done it, like a bullied teenager forced into taking weed by his peers, Gordon Brown has bottled it and given into pressure. He has resigned after spending only 3 years in the job he has lusted after for practically his entire political career. After taking Labour to it’s worst result since 1983, Brown has taken the hint and left No 10.
Fuck it, I don't care anymore. You're all FUCKING BIGOTS.
A year ago, the Tories would have been ecstatic if Brown had stepped down – now they’re running about like headless chickens, terrified that the one major stumbling block between a Lib-Lab coalition has been removed. Despite the Lib Dems being closer to the Labour party in the political views of their electorate and MP’s, it was clear that there was no way Nick Clegg was going to prop up a Labour PM as popular as the bastard offspring of Myra Hindley and Saddam Hussein. Â Brown was despised in Middle England due to his being Scottish public relations difficulties.
Now with Brown out the way, a deal between the Lib Dems and Labour – while not ideal – is a lot more credible. There’s the obvious attack that’s going to come from the Tories and their allies about one unelected PM being replaced with another, but ultimately it’s the politicians who make the decisions, like it or lump it. And a youthful Blairite PM like David Miliband might not be too unpopular in the Home Counties marginals Labour need to retake in the future.
The biggest stumbling block left after Brown’s departure now though is the arithmetic. Despite taking 52% of the popular vote across the UK, Labour and the Lib Dems together do not have over half the seats. In order to form a stable Government, they would need to put together support from an eclectic mix of Democratic Unionists, Irish, Welsh and Scottish Nationalists.
The SDLP have already said their preference is for a Lib Lab pact, and the SNP have been calling for the Lib Dems to explore alternatives to an alliance with the Tories correctly saying that their vote would be badly damaged if they enforced a Tory Government on Scotland. Despite the SNP’s obvious rivalry with Labour it’s leadership know the Scottish people will judge them very harshly if they did anything to stop Labour from keeping the Tories out.
While the Tories Unionist allies are non-existent, the Democratic Unionists do have 8 MP’s in Northern Ireland who could be potential kingmakers in a coalition. Whilst they have officially said they are not opposed in principle to a Lib Lab pact, they are clearly on the right of the political spectrum and would fit more comfortably with the Conservatives.The arithmetic still does not add up though. A Lab-Lib-SDLP pact would not have a majority and neither would a Tory-DUP pact. The SNP, Plaid Cymru, Alliance and Green MP’s would hold real power over decisions.
There’s another issue which makes an elaborate coalition unstable – English Nationalist resentment. While the Tories may have taken only 36% across the UK, in England they have a clear lead of 40% to Labour’s 28%. If a Government dependent on Scottish Labour, Scottish Liberal and other Nationalist MP’s from within the UK enact cuts on English public services you can bet the Tories, UKIP and BNP will attack them for enforcing a dictatorship on the English electorate.
Lets hope the SNP negotiate to ensure these scenes are never repeated again.
There’s already been discontent brewing south of the border on the issue of Labour’s legitimacy to govern England – in 2005 Labour got less votes than the Tories in England for example, but more seats. This is alongside the West Lothian question where Scottish MP’s can vote on decisions that only affect England, and the Barnett formula where Scots receive more funding per head in public services than their English counterparts.
A lot of these concerns are pish – 52% of English voters did support the Liberals and Labour, and the Barnett formula does not take into account Scotland’s massive subsidies to Westminster in Oil money. But the principle would remain – Labour and the Lib Dem’s would rely on Scottish , Irish and Welsh MP’s to govern. Any negotiations to spare cuts from their respective parts of the UK would be attacked in the Tory press as robbing from England.
This would be a difficult situation for a Government in normal circumstances, but this is a Government that needs to enact brutal public service cuts the likes of which have not been seen in generations. When the schools, hospitals, and jobs start to go you can bet MP’s in marginal seats will feel the pressure to defy the whip to save their own skins. A lost by-election or two could scupper the entire Government’s spending plans. This is not a stable environment to make the UK a profitable place for capitalism again.
That’s why the Tories (and probably the markets too) are desperate to keep the Lib Dems in a pact with them. They are the most stable offer on the table, with both parties having a clear majority when put together – and enough breathing space in case any MP’s rebel. But right now it appears the Lib Dems know they won’t get this chance again to hold so much power, and are demanding a voting system that takes their support into account. That could mean the end forever for single party Tory rule, and it’s whether or not that’s an acceptable price to pay for one stable Government that the Tories are mulling over just now.
Armando Iannucci already described in detail what a hung parliament might be like in 1997,
excellent!
but break the link on the video!
Oh hi England, you never seemed to complain before when it was you ruling us without our consent. My response to you now is: HA HA HA HA HA HA HA. Thx, Scotland
I’ve broken the link. We could do with putting blog guidelines on the forum that include NOT MAKING VIDEOS LINKS.
Excellent analysis Andy. The thing that concerns me is that whoever gets into government we’re going to need to step up the level of struggle. Obviously a Lib Lab govt would be weaker, and being dependent on the Greens would be good. But it would also face the near universal hostility of the capitalist media machine, who would portray any strikes etc. against its actions as evidence of how the country is going to hell in a handbasket. Queue possible collapse of the govt and another election a few months down the line that returns a Tory govt? One possible scenario.
Plus, a weak Labour-led government puts the pressure on trade union leaders to not be “too militant” in order to not let the Tories in. I know we shouldn’t hold our class to ransom on the basis of the attitudes of bureaucrats, but it’s also something to think about.
Also, has the Leftfield magazine that James, Neldo and I made in 2007 been uploaded to the site? Just cos I’d like to welcome the departure of Brown with a reminder of how we welcomed his arrival, by reposting the cover with the big steaming jobby.
i’ll scan some leftfields this afternoon jack
The upside is, if a Labour Lib coalition does carry out cuts then it could help break a section of their working class support away from it for good – and some of the more militant TU leaders. If it was a Tory Govt carrying out cuts, Labour could posture with Left speeches in opposition.
Labour have been carrying out awful things in power for years and there was no uprising. A hung parliament was the worst they sunk. I think we all know that a Tory government will be the most fertile ground for both the independence argument and for encouraging a fightback, but it doesn’t stop me being very scared of the irreparable damage that the Tories will be able to do to the welfare state and human rights in the time that they are in government.
I think people need to careful of falling into what I think is a common logical fallacy that the worse oppression gets, the more militant will be the fightback. That’s one possible outcome, but equally possible is that people will get pissed off and scared and let the government away with things. A Tory government is POSSIBLY fertile soil for a fightback, but it really depends on the smartness of those doing the fighting.
My concern is just more that if there’s a Lib Lab deal the Murdoch empire et al will go absolutely berserk, and we could end up with a stronger Tory government a few months down the line than we might get now.
I’m not saying that it doesn’t depend on having a really clever good way of organising a fightback.. what I said was it was more fertile ground, and I think that’s true. Talk to almost anyone who isn’t involved in politics and they’ll say how scared they are of a Tory government, no one except left wing people who have really thought about it and angry, put-out Tories are saying that they are scared of a Lab/Lib coalition. It feels like everything since the Iraq war has been in limbo, with people angry at Labour but unsure what to do about it. A lot if it has to do with the internal conflict of knowing that as bad as Labour get, the Tories could always be worse. People are a bit more forward thinking when it comes to what to do about a Tory government, and they can associate all the bad things that come along with the Tories more easily than they can with Labour, who are a party of contradictions and confuse even their own supporters. Although we’ll see how strong the Tories are and how things pan out due to that. I do think it has more potential for people to get involved in a fightback, a Tory govt, but you’re right it’s of course what we can do with it that matters most, it won’t happen on its own.
Anyway it’s pretty superfluous as Labour have basically now admitted they’re done, they couldn’t get a deal. So we either get Con/Lib coalition, or we get a Tory minority govt with initial Lib Dem backing.
This is me after a year in the resistance to Tory occupied Scotland.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-QVXIXrHTVw