Messages to the People’s Conference on Climate Change
Posted by Jack in Uncategorized, tags: bolivia, climate change, environmentIn response to the utter failure of the world’s governments to tackle the climate crisis in Copenhagen, the left wing government in Bolivia has organised a people’s summit.
Bolivia, Venezuela and other radical developing countries refused to sign the deal that rich countries like Britain and the US tried to force through the Copenhagen summit, exposing it as a scam that would have shifted responsibility on to poorer nations instead of those responsible for climate change. In response, the British government withdrew £2.3 million of climate aid from Bolivia.
The World People’s Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth is bringing together 15, 000 people from environmental groups, organisations for indigenous people, writers, scientists and activists. It’s taking place in the Bolivian city of Cochabamba, where 10 years ago the people won a historic victory against water privatisation that helped pave the way for a left wing government taking power and the moves towards socialism that grassroots organisations in Bolivia are trying to carry out now.
The summit is expected to take proposals to the next UN meeting on climate change in Mexico later this year. These are expected to include a global referendum asking people to vote on solutions to climate change, as well as in an international climate justice court in which major polluters could be prosecuted for their harm to the planet. The conference will demand that rich countries open their borders to allow in the millions of climate refugees created by their own pollution. They also want the UN to draw up an international charter of rights relating to climate change and the environment, such as the right to clean, unpolluted fresh water.
Bolivian President Evo Morales opened the summit with a chant of “For the planet or for death!”, and went on to say:
“Capitalism is the major element responsible for the destruction of the Earth. Capitalism depends on the greatest profit possible. Yet globalization is manifestly creating poverty. For capitalism, we’re only consumers or workers. There is no other aspect to our identities. Capitalism commodifies everything. We must choose either corporations and death or life. We cannot live in harmony with Earth when a few people are controlling the vast majority of the planet. Our new system of collectivist socialism will solve these problems. We are against unlimited development.
We are united here to celebrate the role of indigenous peoples as stewards of the Earth and as an alternative to unsustainable development. Mother Earth belongs to all of us and cannot be sold. Capitalism is synonomous with the destruction of the planet.”
He went on to criticise dependence on plastic materials, which pollute the environment for thousands of years. He contrasted ponchos made of plastic to traditional indigenous ones made of wool, pouring water over the wool poncho to demonstrate how it was more waterproof. This was evidence, he said, of how we needed to return to indigenous ways in order to save the planet.
Some of the most inspiring messages to the conference came from people who couldn’t attend it physically. Leonard Peltier is a Native American political prisoner in the US. He has been imprisoned since 1977 for a murder he did not commit. Peltier was one of a group of civil rights activists who were attacked by the FBI on a reservation in 1975, and in the resulting shootout an activist and two FBI agents were killed. It should be remembered that at this time the FBI was effectively at war with the people of the Pine Ridge reservation, which had a higher murder rate than the city of Detroit, as many activist were killed or disappeared with no investigation. At Peltier’s trial witnesses were coerced and false evidence introduced, leading to his sentence of life imprisonment.
In his message to the conference in Cochabamba conference, Peltier said:
“My name is Leonard Peltier. I am a citizen of the Dakota/Lakota and Anishinabe Nations of North America. Like many of you, I am a tribal person. As Aboriginal peoples, we have always struggled to live in harmony with the Earth. We have maintained our vigilance and bear witness to a blatant disregard for our planet and sustainable life ways. We’ve seen that the pursuit of maximized profits through globalization, privatization, and corporate personhood has become a plague that destroys life. We know that it is not only the land that suffers as a result of these practices. The people most closely associated with the Earth suffer first and most.
The enormous pressures of corporate profits have intruded on our tribal lands, but also on our ancient cultures—even to the extent that many Indigenous cultures have virtually disappeared. Just as our relatives in the animal kingdom are threatened, many more cultures are on the brink of extinction.
In America, we are at ground zero of this war for survival and most often have been left with no mechanism to fight this globalization monster. On those occasions when we are forced into a defensive posture, we are disappeared, tortured, killed, and imprisoned. I myself have served over 34 years in prison for resisting an invasion intent on violating our treaties and stealing our land for the precious resource of uranium. The same desire for uranium has decimated and poisoned the Diné Nation of Arizona and New Mexico. The quest for land for dumping and hiding the toxic waste from various nuclear processes has caused a war to be waged on the Shoshone people of Nevada, as well. These are just a few examples of what “progress” has meant for our peoples. As many can attest, the same struggle is occurring throughout Central and South America. While my defense of my tribal lands made me a political prisoner, I know I’m not at all unique. This struggle has created countless other prisoners of conscience—not to mention prisoners of poor health and loss of life way, as well as victims of guilt and rage.
To live as we were meant to live is our first right. To live free of the fear of forced removal, destroyed homelands, poisoned water, and loss of habitat, food sources, and our overall life way is our righteous demand. We, therefore, continue our struggle to survive in the face of those who deny climate change and refuse to curb corporate powers.
It is time for all our voices to be heard.”
You can read the full text of what he had to say here.
Another person who couldn’t be there was the Uruguayan author Eduardo Galeano. Galeano is a left wing journalist, historian and novelist, who has had to flee Latin America several times for fear of being killed by right wing dictatorships supported by the US. Perhaps his most well known work is ‘The Open Veins of Latin America,’ which tells the story of how Europeans and the US have plundered Latin America and destroyed its environments and peoples since their first arrival over 500 years ago. The book has been hugely influential, being translated into 20 languages. It was banned by the right wing dictatorships that once held power in Brazil, Argentina, Chile and Uruguay. Last year, Venezuelan President Huge Chavez gave Barack Obama a copy at a summit to try and help him understand the revolutionary processes underway in Latin America.
Galeano’s message to the summit said:
“Bolivia is one of the American nations where indigenous cultures have managed to survive, and their voices are now ringing with more force than ever before, despite the scorn and persecution they suffered for a long time.
The entire world, stunned as it is, is wandering about like a blind man in the middle of a crossfire, having to listen to those voices. They teach us that we, tiny beings called humans, are part of nature, relatives to all those who have legs, paws, wings, or roots. The European conquest condemned the indigenous, who lived in that communion with nature, for idolatry, and for believing in that communion they were flogged, their throats were slit, or they were burned alive.
From the times of the European Renaissance, nature has been turned into a commodity or an obstacle to human progress. And, to this day, this divorce between us and her has persisted, so much so that there still are people of good will who are moved by poor nature, so abused, so wounded, but are seeing her only from outside.
Indigenous cultures see her from inside. Seeing her, I see myself. What is done against her is done against me. In her I find myself, my legs are also the road on which they walk.
Let us celebrate, then, this Summit of the Mother Earth. And may the deaf listen: the rights of human beings and the rights of nature are two names of the same dignity.”
You can read the full text of what Galeano had to say here.
a couple of the pictures aren’t displaying!
I fixed the Evo Morales one, but all the others are fine for me, any others you can’t see Liam?
yep fine now.. for some reason, the white ‘quote’ space sometimes runs over the images but it all looks good now!
There’s also mine protests going on at present with fears that Morales will crack down after the summit is finished.
http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=20100423060007815
Morales stated at the conference that people are homosexual because the eat GM foods. Seriously.
No he didn’t. He at no point used the words homosexual or gay. I take it your source for that was a western capitalist media outlet, or a political site that’s anti Morales and took the info from a western capitalist media outlet.
I don’t know exactly what Morales’ as an individual’s views are about LGBT rights, and I think there’s room for misunderstanding here. You can watch a video of what he actually said here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBadLrQlHiE
Although the person uploading it has titled the video “Morales says chicken turns you gay,” the translation they have on the video says no such thing. It says that chicken is “full of female hormones” which causes men “to have deviations in their being as men.”
I think there’s some ambiguity in what he’s saying, and he should come out and clarify if he truly is for LGBT rights. However, my initial understnading of what he’s on about is the concerns many people have about the use of artificial hormones in the capitalist food industry. These can actually have effects on men’s bodies, for example, see this article about the increase in men seeking breast reduction surgery, basically after having developed female breasts, which is linked by the surgeon quoted to oestrogen in the food supply. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article549956.ece
Don’t get me wrong, I think there’s room for interpretation here, and I think Morales should clarify as a matter of urgency (if he does though what’re the chances the western media will cover his clarification with the same zeal they’ve had to call him homophobic?) If Morales does mean homosexuality, then that is indefensible and should be condemned. But I also think that it’s lazy politics to just jump on the latest bandwagon being promoted by the capitalist media and repeat it as if it’s left wing politics. I didn’t go all guns blazing into defending Morales about this, even though I’ve seen plenty of places he’s been attacked on the internet, because I’m trying to get a more nuanced view of what he was trying to say, hopefully after a clarification from him. My Spanish isn’t up to making a full judgement for myself about his meaning.
This blog post, from a gay indigenous man, is quite interesting: http://twospiritsone.blogspot.com/2010/04/is-evo-morales-homophobic-his-remarks.html, as is the one above that: http://twospiritsone.blogspot.com/2010/04/i-am-gay-of-indigenous-heritage-and-i.html I think the blogger here makes a good point that it doesn’t seem like a coincidence that the main part of his speech that got reported is this bit, not the parts about the need to abolish capitalism, how capitalism causes climate change etc.
If we look at what’s actually happened under the MAS government with regards to LGBT rights, the new constitution that Morales and his government have fought to get brought in Bolivia, which was drafted by a constituent assembly, does specifically ban gay marriage (which is bad) but also for the first time in Bolivia outlaws discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and mandates rights for LGBT people. While I think banning marriages is a bad mistake, it should be seen in the context of a constitution that was drafted by the democratic representatives of a country that is overwhelmingly Catholic, and who’s social attitudes reflect that. In that context, the rest of what the constitution has to say is a serious step forward for LGBT rights in Bolivia.
So, to put a short headline on my comment, Evo Morales at no point directly said eating chicken makes people homosexual. Seriously. I really, really wish that people could look into these things just a little bit more before they make their minds up based on superficial corporate media propaganda. All it takes is a little googling, it’s not like you have to be a pure expert!
Also, I’d like to express my solidarity with the mine protesters you linked to, their demands should be met, and they should meet support from the government. I hope the government does support them in their struggle, and I’ll keep an eye on the situation. Interesting in the article you linked to the Bolivian Foreign Minister has already expressed support for them.
The situation Bolivia faces with regard to lithium is an interesting one. Lithium batteries power an increasingly huge proportion of technologies that get manufactured, such as the laptop I’m writing this on. Much of the world’s remaining supply is in Bolivia. The Bolivian government ultimately wants to have the entire industrial process for extracting it, refining it and using it in manufacturing it take place in Bolivia, so it becomes a driver of endogenous development, rather than just have Bolivia serve as a mine for foreign companies. This obviously has environmental implications, and Bolivia is going to have to strike a balance between ecological concerns, economic ones, and the world’s need for lithium. All I’d say is I’d be wary of criticising lithium mining ON THE INTERNET as much of the technology necessary for us to be able to do that relies on lithium batteries!
For more info on lithium and Bolivia, check out this really good article: https://nacla.org/node/6510
“No he didn’t. He at no point used the words homosexual or gay. I take it your source for that was a western capitalist media outlet, or a political site that’s anti Morales and took the info from a western capitalist media outlet.”
It’s strange then that the gay community in Bolivia is so upset about this then.
He didn’t need to say ‘homosexual’ because through Spanish and in the medium of Bolivian society that’s what he meant. I’m inclined to believe Bolivian comrades (the site, unfortunately, is in Spanish): http://noticias.universogay.com/gays-de-bolivia-exigen-a-evo-morales-rectifique-su-declaracion__24042010.html
“Interesting in the article you linked to the Bolivian Foreign Minister has already expressed support for them.”
Again, the SSY comrade seems to take things too literally. Activists are concerned that once the summit that the ’socialist’ government in Bolivia will do what it’s done before and crack down on the miners.
I had a read of the site you posted, interesting looking at the comments section of the article. From what I could make out there was substantial debate taking place about whether Morales’ comments meant what you (and the authors of the article) thought they did. One of the main ones raising concerns was someone who was a contributor to the site. Most of the other comments were racist about Morales-he is a “primate”, “homo erectus” “subnormal” etc. The conclusion I would draw is that there’s disagreement in Bolivia about what he meant, and a lot of people do think he meant the possible effect of oestrogen in the food supply on the body. I have to say, I do get suspicious of the motivations of folk when the comments are a torrent of anti-indigenous racist abuse.
I’d just like to repeat what I originally said: If this was a homophobic remark then that’s indefensible. Either way it’s quite possibly a poorly worded sentence (in part of a much longer speech which has great content about climate change and capitalism). I think the best thing would be if Morales himself would come out and clarify his position.
With regards to the protesters, you don’t need to repeat what’s going on, I get that some have concerns about the way the government will react after the summit. Just thought it was interesting that the foreign minister had expressed support for them. I don’t think it’s inevitable the Bolivian government will crack down on them, is all.
Just an update for folk on the situation with the mine protests-the protesters have suspended their action for now, giving the Japanese company that owns the mine til May 8th to meet their demands. They haven’t had any hassle from the Bolivian government as yet.