bigup LT for the design

I’ve recently received the honour of being selected as the Scottish Socialist Party candidate for Glasgow Central. As a Yoof I’ll be keeping Leftfield updated with all the juicy goss and scandal from the campaign trail.

The constituency is pretty big and covers areas with widely varying demographics, including Pollokshields, Govanhill and the Gorbals in the area south of the river, Calton to the east and my old stomping ground of Anderston and Finnieston in the west. Some sources describe it as the wealthiest seat in Glasgow, which to me simply means it is the most unequal ward, as the riches never seem to have trickled down to many of the people I know

I’ll be standing on the following platform:

  • Say no to cuts, invest in public services
  • Troops Out of Afghanistan NOW
  • Give Youth a future – create new green jobs and end unemployment
  • Defend asylum seekers and refugees
  • For an independent socialist republic
  • Free public transport for all
  • Re-introduce student grants, abolish the loan system
  • Tax the rich, make them pay for their crisis
  • Start a massive program of building homes that are good quality and affordable for all
  • Nationalise the banks and all previously privatised industries

The contest itself is looking like being a big battle between Labour and the SNP, with both standing fairly high-profile candidates. Labour have selected Anas Sarwar, son of the current MP, Mohammed Sarwar. Nothing dodgy about that, eh!? I cursed the (un-)democratic culture within the Glasgow Labour Party when Paul Martin was being lined up to replace his corrupt dad Michael (you know, that idiot who was the Speaker of the House of Commons for a while) and I am equally contemptuous about the Sarwar succession. It reeks. My only previous experience with Sarwar Junior was when I attended a 2007 event at the Carling Academy, entitled Y*Vote. Itwasn’t advertised who was organising it, but whoever it was got a couple of crap bands along – the McDonald bros were the main event and the Zutons did a DJ set, zzzzz – and they banned all parties from handing out literature. Then up pops Anas, revealing it was a Labour front, looking every bit the polished career politician-in-waiting, pleading for our vote. Well he never got mine.

appealing for your vote, totally no nepotism here

In the yellow and black corner (eh, the SNP one) is Osama Saeed, who is nowhere near as bad as the Labour guy, but is unfortunately still standing for a party committed to protecting the interests of their millionaire benefactors. I’ve encountered him a few times recently, as we were both organising protests against the fascist Scottish Defence League, a nasty wee group who tried to take to the streets of Edinburgh and Glasgow. In the end the good guys won (i.e. the SDL got chased away) but I had a big problem with Osama instructing people that all they should do is stand in a park and listen to speeches by establishment politicians, because the polis would deal with the fash. That’s woeful logic in my book and not a reliable way of stopping the rise of 21st century Nazism.  But I still have a fair bit of respect for him, which I wouldnae really say about the Labour guy. Although the recent scandal about the charity he was running has had me scratching my head a bit.

saeed and salmond: thick as thieves

Despite any reservations I may have about Sarwar and Saeed, they would surely be in full agreement with me that the British National Party represent something more than just a wee misguided party who we disagree with. The BNP are the latest form of a long and shameful tradition of British fascism. They are yet to announce a candidate for Glasgow Central, but there is a distinct possibility that they will. They stood here in 2005 and may try to cause tensions in a multi-ethnic constituency with 2 prominent Muslim candidates. Their recent relative success should send a chill down people’s spines. They are a threat not only to ethnic minorities, homosexuals and trade-unionists, but to anyone who values free speech and democracy.

I do not believe that the BNP should be treated in the same way as any normal, democratic political party. If they ever came to power they would install a violent, authoritarian state, and people like me would probably end up in concentration camps. As Anas and Osama will surely know, the BNP are Islamophobic to the core and wherever they make progress, the number of attacks on Muslims and all non-white people increases greatly. I do not think that any democrat should treat them as a legitimate party.  In fact I will stick my neck out here… I do not believe that any of the other parties – socialist or capitalist, revolutionary or moderate – should sit on a platform alongside them and allow them to spread their bile.

There are things we can do to stop them being given an audience.  If the Labour and SNP candidates make it clear that they will not share a platform with the BNP, then organisers of debates/hustings will not invite them. I will be writing to the 2 main candidates to ask them to stand up and make a brave commitment – to pledge not to share a platform with the BNP. None of us should passively allow the fascists to spread their propaganda and build up support. The future is too important, let’s take action to stop them now.

12 Responses to “Labour and SNP – don’t allow BNP a platform”
  1. There’s no scandal whatsoever about the Scottish Islamic Foundation, maybes ask about if you don’t know the facts.
    A witch-hunting article by Tom Gordon is a really bad reference.
    See here for documentation of the racist witch-hunt against Osama Saeed;
    http://www.islamophobia-watch.com/display/Search?searchQuery=Osama+Saeed&moduleId=5533211

  2. Osama Saeed will hopefully win this.

  3. Liam T says:

    fiannanananhalba, i thought you didn’t like pretend anti-fascism?

  4. I dont but im hoping the independence candidate beats the unionist. Fascists and loyalists tend to be unionists so a Muslim Scot who supports our independence is just dandy by me.
    Up the AFA.

  5. @Liam T, any suggestion that Osmama Saeed represents any kind of “pretend” anti-fascism is a smear beneath contempt.
    Osama has consistently won key sections of his community to an out spoken opposition to imperialism and fascism.
    Osama Saeed is an inspirational character, someone who has taken a stand on the side of anti imperialism, for peace and justice.
    I would drop the anti Osama Saeed crap to be honest.

  6. Squeak says:

    I think you misread Liam, Eddie. Fianna is fond of coming on here and saying we’re all fake anti-facsists ie. we don’t start an all guns blazing war wi them.

  7. TheWorstWitch says:

    Yeah, fiannananana thinks everyone but him is a fake anti-fascist.

    re: the Osama Saaed content in the article… we are fundamentally opposed to a lot of what he stands for. therefore we will criticise him, just as we will Sarwar and all of the other crappy candidates who aren’t going to do fuck all to make the world better.
    also: saying that something has you scratching your head isn’t exactly saying that it is the biggest evil in the world ever. it’s just something worth taking note of, considering and making up your own mind about.

  8. Anti fascism is and should be a broad movement although i wish it was explicity pro socialist and i give credit to SSY on that score, but i like robust discussion tactics with fascists when we can get their ear.

    Osama and i would disagree on a lot of stuff certainly anti fascist tactics but he is a committed supporter of independence and definitely a decent social democratic progressive.

  9. The issue isn’t about references to your readers, it’s about including anti Muslim witch-hunts as part of your narrative for standing in Glasgow Central.
    The reference to the Tom Gordon article on Osama and the Scottish Islamic Foundation is a bad mistake, I included a link up the thread to sources for an organised racist campaign against Osama, going anywhere near that is a really bad idea.

  10. Squeak says:

    Eddie, James is probably offline; it’s quarter past twelve.

  11. Liam T says:

    I think it’s perfectly legitimate to criticise Osama Saeed for quite serious allegations that have been widely reported in the press.
    I’m sure some people have chosen to focus on these allegations specifically as a pretext to attack a prominent muslim and an Islamic organisation – a racist witchhunt – but this article clearly doesn’t possess that agenda though, and anyway, it was a minor reference, hardly the main focus of the story.
    We’ve lambasted steven purcell recently in a number of articles on the basis of what has, after all, largely been rumour and hearsay – yet james puts in one minor reference to allegations reported in the media recently and we’re suddenly throwing ourselves open to accusations of islamophobia?

  12. Liam T says; “I think it’s perfectly legitimate to criticise Osama Saeed for quite serious allegations that have been widely reported in the press.”
    Well come on then, make your specific allegations, back it up with evidence, as in sources.
    The evidence against Purcell is there for all to see, the innuendo against Osama is just that, without any foundation whatsoever.
    Again, I posted further up a catalogue of the racist smears against Osama, to even reference that to try and discredit Osama is appalling.

  13.